Beste luitjes,
Ik heb net geprobeerd m'n laatste setje te uploaden naar Soundcloud, helaas kreeg ik een waarschuwing:
Citaat:
Copyright Notification: “Mr. Digger - Augustus #3 '11”
Our automatic content protection system has identified that your sounds, “Mr. Digger - Augustus #3 '11”, contain copyright material from the track “Gimme Love” which is a copyright work owned or administered by Jackpot. We’ve blocked the upload of your sounds for the time being.
Valid reasons to dispute a claim are:
You are the copyright owner
You can dispute the claim if you are the copyright owner and have the exclusive right to share this material on SoundCloud.
You are working on behalf of the copyright owner
You can dispute the claim if you are working on behalf of the copyright owner who has given you permission to share this material on SoundCloud - for example, you are a PR agency working on behalf of a rightsholder.
The copyright work has been mistakenly identified
You can dispute the claim if the copyright work does not actually appear in the material you uploaded.
You have a valid license from the copyright owner
You can dispute the claim if you have a valid license, for example, you uploaded sounds containing audio samples but you have already cleared these samples with the relevant copyright owners.
Invalid reasons to dispute a claim might include:
You purchased the track online and/or own the CD or vinyl
Buying a copy of a music track digitally or physically does not give you the right to share that music track on SoundCloud. Online distribution is a right that belongs to the copyright owner.
You only used a small part of the copyright work
Generally, if you are using someone else's copyright work, you need their permission to publish that work on SoundCloud, whether it's the whole work or just a small part (e.g. a sample).
You adapted the copyright work and created something new
You still need the copyright owner’s permission, even if you’ve created something new.
You don’t earn any money from it
You still need the copyright owner’s permission even if you are not making any money from it.
Other tracks on SoundCloud contain the same copyright content
Permission to use or publish copyright material is granted on individual basis by the copyright owner or their representative. The fact that someone else may have permission to use the same content does not mean that it is freely available for everyone to use. A separate license has to be obtained for each case.
It’s a free download
Some artists may give away their album or track as free download. You still need permission from the copyright owner to publish the copyright work on SoundCloud even if the copyright owner has made it available for free elsewhere.
You included a copyright notice or credit
A copyright notice or credit is often a condition of a license, but it is not a substitute for a license. You still need permission from the copyright owner, even if you give them credit.
Dit heb ik nog nooit eerder gehad en ik vind het erg hoerig.
1. Is Digital Age Records het eerste label dat dit soort maatregelen treft?
2. Verneuken dit soort maatregelen (mits het een trend wordt) niet het hele genre?
Al jarenlang wordt elektronische muziek door DJ's gedraaid en verspreid.
Zo kreeg je als kleine artiest wat naamsbekendheid en daar was alles en iedereen blij mee.
Ik dacht BUMA/STEMRA de enige waren, die er een slaatje uit probeerden te slaan.
Nu blijkt het dus dat Digital Age een nieuwe ontwikkeling in zet? Of sla ik hier de plank mis?
Hit me.